Blended versus face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for severe fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: A non-inferiority RCT

混合式认知行为疗法与面对面认知行为疗法治疗多发性硬化症患者重度疲劳的疗效比较:一项非劣效性随机对照试验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) reduces multiple sclerosis (MS)-related fatigue. Implementation of face-to-face CBT is hindered by limited treatment capacity and traveling distances to treatment locations. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate whether blended CBT (online treatment modules supported with guidance by a therapist) is non-inferior to face-to-face CBT in reducing fatigue severity in severely fatigued patients with MS. METHOD: A non-inferiority multicentre randomized clinical trial, in which 166 patients with MS were allocated to either face-to-face or blended CBT. Primary outcome was fatigue severity assessed with the Checklist Individual Strength fatigue subscale directly post-treatment (week 20). Mixed model analysis was used by a statistician blinded for allocation to determine between-group differences post-treatment. The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was compared to a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 5.32. RESULTS: Blended CBT (N = 82) was non-inferior to face-to-face CBT (N = 84) (B = 1.70, 95% CI: -1.51 to 4.90). Blended CBT significantly reduced therapist time (B = -187.1 minutes, 95% CI: 141.0-233.3). Post hoc analysis showed more improvement (B = -5.35, 95% CI: -9.22 to -1.48) when patients received their preferred treatment. No harm related to treatment was reported. DISCUSSION: Blended CBT is an efficient alternative to face-to-face CBT. Offering the preferred CBT format may optimize treatment outcome.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。