Abstract
Microdose administration of ABY-029, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor Affibody molecule conjugated to IRDye 800CW, is being studied in a Phase 0 trial for resection of soft-tissue sarcomas. The excised tissue of a single patient in the microdose administration group was imaged with both a wide-field fluorescence surgical system and a flat-bed scanning fluorescence imaging system. Here the resultant fluorescence from a breadloaf section of the primary tumor specimen and six region-specific tissue samples collected from that breadloaf are compared using these two imaging systems - a flatbed, black-box, fluorescence scanning system, the Odyssey CLx, and a open-air, wide-field, pre-clinical surgical imaging system, the Solaris. Florescence signal is compared using a variety of methods including: mean, standard deviation, variance, tumor-to-background ratio, biological-variance ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio. The images produced from the Odyssey scanner have higher signal variance but more accurately represent the EGFR expression in small tissue sections. The Solaris system has higher depth sensitivity and volume averaging, and as such has lower signal variation and higher contrast-to-noise ratio.