Timing of Antimicrobial Lock Replacement for Gram-Positive Port Infections: Results of a Randomized Trial

革兰氏阳性菌输液港感染抗菌封管更换时机:一项随机试验的结果

阅读:2

Abstract

Background: Conservative management of port-related bacteremia often includes locally administered antimicrobials, known as antimicrobial lock therapy (ALT). Current guidelines recommend daily replacement of antimicrobial lock solutions (ALSs). We aimed to evaluate whether ALSs could remain effective with extended dwell times of up to 10 days. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, patients with noninfected, recently implanted ports were assigned to one of five ALS dwell-time groups, ranging from 1 to 10 days. Each ALS contained heparin plus an antimicrobial at standard intraluminal concentrations: vancomycin 2 mg/mL, teicoplanin 10 mg/mL, linezolid 1.8 mg/mL, daptomycin 5 mg/mL, or tigecycline 4.5 mg/mL. The primary endpoint was the time at which intraluminal drug concentrations decreased below 1 mg/mL (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01592032). Results: Vancomycin and linezolid concentrations fell significantly below 1 mg/mL after 3 days of dwell time. Daptomycin and tigecycline concentrations decreased significantly after 7 days but remained above 1 mg/mL. Teicoplanin concentrations did not decline significantly after 7 days. Conclusions: Optimal ALS dwell time depends on the antimicrobial agent. Vancomycin and linezolid locks require daily replacement, whereas daptomycin, tigecycline, and teicoplanin locks maintain therapeutic concentrations for up to 7 days. These findings support individualized ALS replacement strategies, potentially reducing the need for daily interventions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。