Abstract
Background/Objectives: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication following both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). While the microbiological profile of TKA PJI has been well characterized, limited data exist regarding UKA PJIs. This study aimed to compare the causative microorganisms and surgical treatment outcomes in PJI cases following UKA and TKA. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 82 patients (71 TKA and 11 UKA) who underwent surgical treatment for PJI between January 2017 and May 2024. PJI was diagnosed based on the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Treatment strategies included debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or two-stage revision arthroplasty. Microbiological data were extracted from intraoperative cultures. Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical comparisons. Results: Gram-positive organisms, primarily Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, were isolated in all UKA PJIs. In contrast, the TKA group demonstrated greater microbial diversity, including Gram-negative bacilli, polymicrobial infections, and a higher rate of culture-negative cases (33.8% vs. 18.2%). DAIR was performed more frequently in UKA cases (72.7% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.002). Recurrence rates following DAIR were similar in both groups (12.5% in UKA, 20.0% in TKA, p = 1.000). Two-stage revision resulted in no recurrence in UKA and a 9.8% recurrence rate in TKA patients. Conclusions: UKA PJIs appear to be microbiologically less complex than TKA PJI cases, with Gram-positive organisms predominating. Despite these differences, the outcomes of surgical treatment-both DAIR and two-stage revision-were comparable between groups. Standard PJI treatment principles may be applicable to both arthroplasty types; however, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.