Abstract
Obesity and type 2 diabetes are major factors in COVID-19 causing a progression to excessive morbidity and mortality. An important characteristic of these conditions is poor glycaemic control leading to inappropriate chemical reactions and the production of glycated proteins in which positively charged lysine and arginine residues are neutralised. We propose that this protein glycation primes the inflammatory system as the presence of aspartate and glutamate residues in any glycated zwitterionic protein will thus increase its anionic characteristics. As a result, these macromolecules will be recognised by the innate immune system and identified as originating from infection or cell damage (sterile inflammation). Many proteins in the body exist to non-specifically target these anionic macromolecules and rely heavily on positively charged (cationic) binding-sites to produce a relatively non-specific interaction as the first step in the body's response. Proteins involved in this innate immunity are collectively referred to as damage associated molecular pattern molecules or pathogen associated molecular pattern molecules. A crucial player in this process is RAGE (Receptor for Advanced Glycation End products). RAGE plays a central role in the inflammatory response and on ligand binding stimulates many aspects of inflammation including the production of the key inflammatory mediator NF-κB, and the subsequent production of inflammatory cytokines. This process has the potential to show a positive feedback loop resulting in a dramatic response within the tissue. We propose that protein glycation primes the inflammatory system by generating negatively charged surfaces so that when a SARS-Cov-2 infection occurs within the lung the further release of negatively-charged macromolecules due to cell damage results in a potentially catastrophic inflammatory response resulting in the cytokine storm associated with COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. That part of the population who do not suffer from inflammatory priming (Phase 1), such as the young and the non-obese, should not be subjected to the catastrophic inflammatory response seen in others (Phase 2). This hypothesis further highlights the need for improved dietary intake to minimise the inflammatory priming resulting from poor glycaemic control.