Abstract
PURPOSE: The J-difference edited γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signal is contaminated by other co-edited signals-the largest of which originates from co-edited macromolecules (MMs)-and is consequently often reported as "GABA+." MM signals are broader and less well-characterized than the metabolites, and are commonly approximated using a Gaussian model parameterization. Experimentally measured MM signals are a consensus-recommended alternative to parameterized modeling; however, they are relatively under-studied in the context of edited MRS. METHODS: To address this limitation in the literature, we have acquired GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS data with pre-inversion to null metabolite signals in 13 healthy controls. An experimental MM basis function was derived from the mean across subjects. We further derived a new parameterization of the MM signals from the experimental data, using multiple Gaussians to accurately represent their observed asymmetry. The previous single-Gaussian parameterization, mean experimental MM spectrum and new multi-Gaussian parameterization were compared in a three-way analysis of a public MEGA-PRESS dataset of 61 healthy participants. RESULTS: Both the experimental MMs and the multi-Gaussian parameterization exhibited reduced fit residuals compared to the single-Gaussian approach (p = 0.034 and p = 0.031, respectively), suggesting they better represent the underlying data than the single-Gaussian parameterization. Furthermore, both experimentally derived models estimated larger MM fractional contribution to the GABA+ signal for the experimental MMs (58%) and multi-Gaussian parameterization (58%), compared to the single-Gaussian approach (50%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that single-Gaussian parameterization of edited MM signals is insufficient and that both experimentally derived GABA+ spectra and their parameterized replicas improve the modeling of GABA+ spectra.