Background
Regulatory guidelines recommend shelf life of herbal products to be established through systematic stability studies.
Conclusion
Phytochemical composition and antidiabetic efficacy of S. cumini extract remain unchanged during its storage under both accelerated and long-term stability conditions, which suggest its shelf life to be 30 months. Also, GA and EA are not appropriate anti-diabetic markers.
Material and methods
The extract was stored under accelerated (40°C/75 %RH) and long-term (25°C/60 %RH) stability conditions for 6 and 30 months, respectively. Samples were withdrawn at periodic intervals and analysed through two validated HPLC-UV methods (I and II) for fingerprint and quantitative analysis of markers. Antidiabetic activity of control and stability samples was evaluated by α-glucosidase inhibitory model.
Methods
The extract was stored under accelerated (40°C/75 %RH) and long-term (25°C/60 %RH) stability conditions for 6 and 30 months, respectively. Samples were withdrawn at periodic intervals and analysed through two validated HPLC-UV methods (I and II) for fingerprint and quantitative analysis of markers. Antidiabetic activity of control and stability samples was evaluated by α-glucosidase inhibitory model.
Objective
The study was designed to establish shelf life of Syzygium cumini extract through accelerated and long-term stability testing as per WHO guidelines. Material and
Results
Method I generated a well resolved fingerprint of the control sample that was found to contain gallic acid (GA, 1.45 % w/w) and ellagic acid (EA, 3.97 % w/w). The content of GA did not change under both the stability conditions, but that of EA varied insignificantly (3.97-4.77 % w/w) under long-term conditions up to 24 months and subsequently decrease to 3.15 % w/w after 30 months. There was no visible change in LC-UV fingerprint of any stability sample with respect to control. α-Glucosidase inhibitory activity of all stability samples also remained unaltered as compared to control sample (IC50 1.48 mg/mL). GA and EA did not elicit any activity at the concentrations present in the extract.