Abstract
The susceptibility of rat brain to induction of cancer by N-nitroso-N-ethyl-urea (NEU) increases dramatically from a very low level in the 12 day foetus to a maximum at the time of birth, and then decreases with age. Liver tumors are rarely induced by a single treatment with NEU at any age. If induction of cancer by nitroso-alkyl-ureas depends on replication of DNA containing the mispairing base O6-alkylguanine, susceptibility would reflect the balance between the protective effect of removal of the base by repair mechanisms and the potentiating effect of cell replication. The capacity of tissues to remove O6-alkyl-guanine from DNA depends on the amount of alkyl acceptor protein (AAP) present. To study the concept that carcinogenesis results from replication of alkylated DNA, the AAP contents and relative rates of DNA replication were studied in brain and liver of rats at various stages of development, from the 12 day foetus to the 48 week old rat. Replication in liver was approximately ten times higher than in intra-cranial contents at each stage of development studies. The AAP content was higher in the 12 day foetal brain than later, decreasing to low levels as susceptibility to NEU increased until the time of birth, and then remaining low in the adult. The peak sensitivity of brain therefore corresponds to the time at which AAP content is low and rate of DNA replication is high. With liver, AAP levels are low in the foetus, although higher than in brain, and increase after birth. The higher level of AAP in the foetal liver compared with that of brain is possibly sufficient to explain why cancer is not induced in liver in spite of the high rate of DNA replication. The results are consistent with the concept that replication of alkylated DNA is an essential event in initiation. There may be no quantitative relationship between replication and repair and susceptibility to cancer on comparison of different tissues, owing to the fact that, at the cellular level, cancer is a rare event. The amount of mispairing at replication necessary to bring it about may depend on the detailed organisation of the genome, and hence on cell type.