Abstract
In recent years, several deep learning-based methods have been proposed for predicting peptide fragment intensities. This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of six such methods, namely Prosit, DeepMass:Prism, pDeep3, AlphaPeptDeep, Prosit Transformer, and the method proposed by Guan et al. To this end, we evaluated the accuracy of the predicted intensity profiles for close to 1.7 million precursors (including both tryptic and HLA peptides) corresponding to more than 18 million experimental spectra procured from 40 independent submissions to the PRIDE repository that were acquired for different species using a variety of instruments and different dissociation types/energies. Specifically, for each method, distributions of similarity (measured by Pearson's correlation and normalized angle) between the predicted and the corresponding experimental b and y fragment intensities were generated. These distributions were used to ascertain the prediction accuracy and rank the prediction methods for particular types of experimental conditions. The effect of variables like precursor charge, length, and collision energy on the prediction accuracy was also investigated. In addition to prediction accuracy, the methods were evaluated in terms of prediction speed. The systematic assessment of these six methods may help in choosing the right method for MS/MS spectra prediction for particular needs.