Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the coordinated and independent actions of lung lobes during respiration using quantitative computed tomography (CT) in order to increase our in vivo understanding of pulmonary anatomy. METHODS: Cases for whom test results showed normal pulmonary function tests (PFTs) results, and normal paired inspiratory-expiratory chest CT findings, as assessed by 2 radiologists, were retrospectively included in this study. From the chest CT results, we measured quantitative indices of lung volume (LV) and mean lung density (MLD) for the total lung (TL), left lung (LL), right lung (RL), and 5 lobes in inspiratory and expiratory phases. The differences of these measures between bilateral lungs and among the lobes were evaluated to study whether they were consistent or different during respiration. RESULTS: A total of 70 cases were included {median age of 49.5 [interquartile range (IQR), 38.0 to 60.3] years; 32 males; 38 females}. Overall, the inspiratory and expiratory volumes of the LL were smaller than those of the RL (both P<0.001). For the ventilation workload (λ, which indicates the ratio of lobar volume to total LV), the end-expiratory volume ratio (λ(ex) ) of the LL was 0.44 (IQR, 0.43 to 0.46), while the end-inspiratory volume ratio (λ(in) ) had risen to 0.46 (IQR, 0.45 to 0.47) (P<0.001). Comparing the 5 lobes, not all lobes shared the same LV. However, the left lower lobe (LLL) and right lower lobe (RLL) showed some similarities. The λ(in-LLL) and λ(in-RLL) was higher than λ(ex-LLL) and λ(ex-RLL) , respectively (both P<0.001), while the ratios of the other lobes reduced. The pairwise mean absolute difference (PMAD) on λ(in) and λ(ex) of the bilateral lower lobes was low in inspiration (0.0288) and expiration (0.0346). The MLD of bilateral lower lobes showed consistency in inspiration or in expiration (inspiration: P>0.999; expiration: P=0.975). In addition, the PMADs between the right middle lobe (RML) and other lobes were significantly larger than the PMAD between other pairs of lobes in both inspiration and expiration. Beyond that, the expiratory MLD of RML [-789.6 (IQR, -814 to -762.05) HU] was the lowest among the 5 lobes. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the LL assumes a higher workload during ventilation than it does during respiration. The 5 normal lobes were non-synchronous during respiration and contributed differently to ventilation. The bilateral lower lobes showed similarities and had a high-ventilation function, while and the LV and MLD of the RML showed the least changes within a respiration cycle.