Comparison of enteric methane emissions between the respiration chamber and the carbon dioxide method in Holstein heifer

荷斯坦小母牛呼吸室法与二氧化碳法测定肠道甲烷排放量的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

The carbon dioxide (CO(2)) method (CO(2)T) for measuring enteric methane (CH(4)) emissions was validated using emissions data derived from respiration chambers (RC). The study was conducted over a period of 108 d using ten Holstein heifers with a mean initial body weight (BW) of 178 ± 24 kg and average age of 7 ± 0.7 months. There were three consecutive experimental periods, each consisting of 21 d of premeasurement feeding, followed by two 3-d periods of CH(4) measurement sessions with the CO(2)T and the RC, respectively, for each animal. The diet consisted of 55% timothy hay and 45% concentrate, and was supplied twice daily at 1.2% to 1.5% BW on an as-fed basis. The CO(2)T measurements were conducted at morning and afternoon feeding. There were no significant differences in dry matter intake (DMI; P = 0.155), CH(4) production (L/d and L/kg BW(0.75); P = 0.492 and P = 0.625, respectively), and CH(4) yield (L/kg DMI; P = 0.275) between the two methods. Results obtained using the RC and the CO(2)T were strongly correlated for both CH(4) production (L/d; r = 0.67, P = 0.042) and CH(4) yield (L/kg DMI; r = 0.61, P = 0.062). Linear regression analysis revealed moderate positive relationships between the two methods for CH(4) production (R (2) = 0.52; P = 0.019) and CH(4) yield (R (2) = 0.43; P = 0.039). In conclusion, the CO(2)T and the RC produce comparable results, with acceptable accuracy and precision.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。