Aims
There is a possible significant difficulty in differentiating between non-specific colitis (NSC) and early IBD patients with no cardinal endoscopic features. This clarifies the need to find markers with high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between both and other forms of specific colitis. The aim of this study to investigate the ability to use a chemokine panel (CCR9, CD146 and Foxp3) among patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms found to have NSC (but do not have current IBD) to predict which patients progress to/develop future IBD or other diagnoses of specific colitis.
Background & aims
There is a possible significant difficulty in differentiating between non-specific colitis (NSC) and early IBD patients with no cardinal endoscopic features. This clarifies the need to find markers with high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between both and other forms of specific colitis. The aim of this study to investigate the ability to use a chemokine panel (CCR9, CD146 and Foxp3) among patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms found to have NSC (but do not have current IBD) to predict which patients progress to/develop future IBD or other diagnoses of specific colitis.
Conclusions
This panel of markers holds a promising hope for early IBD as predictive markers, discriminating IBD from NSC and as potential therapeutic targets.
Methods
Colonoscopy was done for 182 patients complaining of chronic diarrhea and or constipation, abdominal distention and pain with negative history for IBD, after Histopathological evaluation; 138 cases showing non-specific inflammation submitted for further immunohistochemical CCR9, CD146 and Foxp3 staining. On follow up patients with persistent symptoms or worsen symptoms recolonoscopy was done followed by Histopathological examination of samples and compared by the earlier
Results
The studied markers expressed significantly in IBD patients differentiating them from NSC patients (p < 0.001) except for CCR9 expression was statistically insignificant in CD patients (p = 0.528). According to the ROC curves in prediction of progression using studied panel, the use of studied markers in combination was more statistically significant in comparison to each marker alone. Median follow up for studied patients was 12 months. Conclusions: This panel of markers holds a promising hope for early IBD as predictive markers, discriminating IBD from NSC and as potential therapeutic targets.