Abstract
AIM: Administration of at least 30 mL/kg of fluid as fluid resuscitation is recommended for patients with sepsis and signs of hypoperfusion. However, it is not clear whether this is appropriate for patients with a do-not-intubate (DNI) order. This study evaluated the association between volume of fluid resuscitation and outcomes in patients with infection, signs of hypoperfusion, and a DNI order in an emergency department. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. We classified the infected patients with signs of hypoperfusion and a DNI order seen in our emergency department between April 1, 2015 and November 31, 2020 into the standard fluid resuscitation group (≥30 mL/kg) and the restricted fluid resuscitation group (<30 mL/kg). We compared with in-hospital mortality and the rate of discharge to home in two groups. RESULTS: Of 367 patients, 149 received standard fluid resuscitation and 218 received restricted fluid resuscitation. In-hospital mortality was similar in each group (40/149 and 62/218, respectively). Standard fluid resuscitation was not associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.77, P = 0.86), but was associated with a significantly lower rate of discharge to home (aOR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-0.98, P = 0.043). There was no significant difference in respiratory rate or need for oxygen therapy post-resuscitation between the two groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that fluid resuscitation may be not beneficial for infected patients with signs of hypoperfusion and a DNI order. Further studies should be conducted on the options for resuscitation management for these patients.