When is it futile for ambulance personnel to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

救护人员何时不应进行心肺复苏?

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with unexpected prehospital cardiac arrest could be identified in whom ambulance resuscitation attempts would be futile. DESIGN: Review of ambulance and hospital records; detailed review of automated external defibrillator rhythm strips of patients in whom no shock was advised. SETTING: Scottish Ambulance Service; all cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts after cardiorespiratory arrest during 1988-94 included in the Heartstart Scotland database. SUBJECT: 414 cardiorespiratory arrest patients with no pulse or breathing on arrival of ambulance personnel, no bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed, and more than 15 minutes from time of arrest to arrival of ambulance. Patients were stratified into those with "shockable" and "non-shockable" rhythms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Return of spontaneous circulation, or survival to reach hospital alive, or survival to discharge, or all three. RESULTS: No patient with a non-shockable rhythm who met the entry criteria for analysis survived a resuscitation attempt. Review of the defibrillator rhythm strips of these patients failed to find any case in which the tracing was deemed compatible with survival. CONCLUSION: On the basis that it would be inappropriate to initiate vigorous resuscitation in patients who can be identified as "dead" and beyond help an algorithm was prepared to guide ambulance personnel.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。