Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of 3 neonatal simulators in training medical students in resuscitation skills. INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based training is a critical component of neonatal resuscitation education. However, few studies have compared the educational value of different neonatal simulators. METHODS: Sixty-eight fourth-year medical students participated in a Pediatric Advanced Life Support simulation session using the Brayden Baby, Prestan Professional, and Baby Anne simulators. Following hands-on practice, students completed a Likert-scale questionnaire evaluating each simulator. Data were analyzed using Chi-square tests. RESULTS: Brayden Baby was significantly preferred in 7 out of 9 categories, including ease of positioning, ventilation, mask placement, and overall realism (P < .05). Baby Anne was rated highest for realism in foreign body removal. CONCLUSION: Brayden Baby emerged as the most effective simulator, indicating its greater suitability for neonatal training. Careful simulator selection may enhance learning outcomes in neonatal resuscitation education.