Dissociated Oxygen Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Production in the Post-Cardiac Arrest Rat: A Novel Metabolic Phenotype

心脏骤停后大鼠氧消耗和二氧化碳生成的分离:一种新的代谢表型

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The concept that resuscitation from cardiac arrest (CA) results in a metabolic injury is broadly accepted, yet patients never receive this diagnosis. We sought to find evidence of metabolic injuries after CA by measuring O(2) consumption and CO(2) production (VCO(2)) in a rodent model. In addition, we tested the effect of inspired 100% O(2) on the metabolism. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rats were anesthetized and randomized into 3 groups: resuscitation from 10-minute asphyxia with inhaled 100% O(2) (CA-fraction of inspired O(2) [FIO(2)] 1.0), with 30% O(2) (CA-FIO(2) 0.3), and sham with 30% O(2) (sham-FIO(2) 0.3). Animals were resuscitated with manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The volume of extracted O(2) (VO(2)) and VCO(2) were measured for a 2-hour period after resuscitation. The respiratory quotient (RQ) was RQ=VCO(2)/VO(2). VCO(2) was elevated in CA-FIO(2) 1.0 and CA-FIO(2) 0.3 when compared with sham-FIO(2) 0.3 in minutes 5 to 40 after resuscitation (CA-FIO(2) 1.0: 16.7±2.2, P<0.01; CA-FIO(2) 0.3: 17.4±1.4, P<0.01; versus sham-FIO(2) 0.3: 13.6±1.1 mL/kg per minute), and then returned to normal. VO(2) in CA-FIO(2) 1.0 and CA-FIO(2) 0.3 increased gradually and was significantly higher than sham-FIO(2) 0.3 2 hours after resuscitation (CA-FIO(2) 1.0: 28.7±6.7, P<0.01; CA-FIO(2) 0.3: 24.4±2.3, P<0.01; versus sham-FIO(2) 0.3: 15.8±2.4 mL/kg per minute). The RQ of CA animals persistently decreased (CA-FIO(2) 1.0: 0.54±0.12 versus CA-FIO(2) 0.3: 0.68±0.05 versus sham-FIO(2) 0.3: 0.93±0.11, P<0.01 overall). CONCLUSIONS: CA altered cellular metabolism resulting in increased VO(2) with normal VCO(2). Normal VCO(2) suggests that the postresuscitation Krebs cycle is operating at a presumably healthy rate. Increased VO(2) in the face of normal VCO(2) suggests a significant alteration in O(2) utilization in postresuscitation. Several RQ values fell well outside the normally cited range of 0.7 to 1.0. Higher FIO(2) may increase VO(2), leading to even lower RQ values.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。