Leak during term neonatal CPAP stabilisation: does resuscitation device design affect delivered PEEP - a bench study

足月新生儿持续气道正压通气稳定期漏气:复苏装置设计是否影响呼气末正压(PEEP)输送——一项体外研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mask leak is common during newborn resuscitation, impacting delivered ventilation. Less is known about the effect of leak during assisted spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). AIM: Compare CPAP performance in the presence of leak of two T-piece resuscitation devices, with differing design-imposed resistances: high resistance Neopuff and low resistance rPAP. METHODS: Devices were tested on a term dynamic lung model (compliance 1.0 mL/cmH(2)O, tidal volume (VT) 23 mL) at three incremental leak levels and set positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH(2)O, 7 cmH(2)O and 9 cmH(2)O. Continuous leaks were generated by differing-length tubes open to atmosphere. Measured parameters were mean pressure, fluctuations around set pressure (∆P), VT and leak flow. RESULTS: 2437 breaths were analysed (1216 rPAP, 1221 Neopuff). Leak reduced PEEP, with the largest reduction at the highest leak and 9 cmH(2)O set PEEP (Neopuff 2.6 cmH(2)O vs rPAP 7.0 cmH(2)O). Higher delivered PEEP was associated with higher leak flows (Neopuff 4.4 L/min vs rPAP 8.2 L/min, 9 cmH(2)O set PEEP). VT reduced with Neopuff compared with rPAP (Neopuff 18 mL vs rPAP 23.2 mL, no leak, 9 cmH(2)O set PEEP) and was affected by delivered PEEP. CONCLUSION: The delivered support differed between devices in the presence of leaks. rPAP maintained pressures closer to the set PEEP value at all leak levels, and higher leak flows were seen with the maintained distending pressure. Neopuff's higher resistance led to reductions in VT that were more pronounced at low leak levels.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。