Abstract
This abstract was presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, September 2014 with the abstract published (Neumann C, Thompson D, and Sidman J; Assisted reproduction is not associated with increased risk of head and neck defects; Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; Vol 151, Issue 1, supplement, 2014). Objectives - Compare the rate of head and neck anomalies between children conceived via artificial reproductive technology (ART) versus those conceived via natural methods. - Determine the risk of congenital head and neck abnormalities associated with ART. Study design A retrospective chart review cross-sectional study from 2004-2014 of all patients admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Results A total of 14,857 charts were examined; 2,288 patients were conceived via ART, while 12,569 patients were conceived via natural methods. There were 8,022 males and 6,637 females. There were 40 patients born with defects via ART, while there were 681 patients born with defects via natural conception. The total occurrence of congenital malformations was higher for patients conceived naturally versus those conceived with artificial reproduction (5.41% vs. 1.74%). The odds ratio was 0.31 with a 95% CI of 0.23 to 0.43 and a P-value of < 0.0001; the relative risk of having any one of the head and neck defects with ART was 1.04 with a 95% CI of 1.03 to 1.05 and a P-value < 0.0001. Conclusion There appears to be no increased risk of congenital head and neck defects in children conceived via ART versus those conceived naturally.