Abstract
Genomic epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) could transform outbreak investigations, but its clinical introduction is hampered by the lack of automated data analysis tools to rapidly and accurately define transmission based on sequence relatedness. We aimed to evaluate a fully automated bioinformatics system for MRSA genome analysis versus a bespoke researcher-led manual informatics pipeline. We analyzed 781 MRSA genomes from 777 consecutive patients identified over a 9-month period in a clinical microbiology laboratory in the United Kingdom. Outputs were bacterial species identification, detection of mec genes, assignment to sequence types (STs), identification of pairwise relatedness using a definition of ≤25 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) apart, and use of genetic relatedness to identify clusters. There was full concordance between the two analysis methods for species identification, detection of mec genes, and ST assignment. A total of 3,311 isolate pairs ≤25 SNPs apart were identified by at least one method. These had a median (range) SNP difference between the two methods of 1.2 SNPs (0 to 22 SNPs), with most isolate pairs (87%) varying by ≤2 SNPs. This similarity increased when the research pipeline was modified to use a clonal-complex-specific reference (median 0 SNP difference, 91% varying by ≤2 SNPs). Both pipelines clustered 338 isolates/334 patients into 66 unique clusters based on genetic relatedness. We conclude that the automated transmission detection tool worked at least as well as a researcher-led manual analysis and indicates how such tools could support the rapid use of MRSA genomic epidemiology in infection control practice. IMPORTANCE It has been clearly established that genome sequencing of MRSA improves the accuracy of health care-associated outbreak investigations, including the confirmation and exclusion of outbreaks and identification of patients involved. This could lead to more targeted infection control actions but its use in clinical practice is prevented by several barriers, one of which is the availability of genome analysis tools that do not depend on specialist knowledge to analyze or interpret the results. We evaluated a prototype of a fully automated bioinformatics system for MRSA genome analysis versus a bespoke researcher-led manual informatics pipeline, using genomes from 777 patients over a period of 9 months. The performance was at least equivalent to the researcher-led manual genomic analysis. This indicates the feasibility of automated analysis and represents one more step toward the routine use of pathogen sequencing in infection prevention and control practice.