Abstract
The field of clinical metagenomics for infectious disease diagnostics has advanced to combining questions of technical methodologies with best-use practices due to lowering barriers of implementation. This commentary identifies challenges facing further development of the field and proposes methods for advancement by highlighting a recent prospective pilot study evaluating a targeted metagenomic approach for infectious endocarditis. This commentary introduces the concept of operational value as a method for standardizing results generated by differing clinical metagenomic approaches. Operational value includes assessments of result quality, utility, and cost through incorporating methodological aspects of metagenomics as applied to various infectious syndromes, patient populations, and specimen types. Focus is placed on standardizing outcome-based metrics using an operational value matrix. As ambitions of clinical metagenomics are increasingly realized, new models of study design and collaboration could promote progress toward routine use and positive benefits for patients with infectious diseases.