Comparison of Two Morphine Dosing Strategies in the Management of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome

两种吗啡给药策略在新生儿戒断综合征治疗中的比较

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) has increased in recent years. Treatment approaches usually involve opioid replacement; however, the optimal treatment strategy is unknown. This study sought to determine the impact of weight- and symptom-based morphine dosing strategies on LOS and medication exposure in patients with NAS. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted from May 2015 to June 2017 at 2 NICUs within a health-system using different dosing approaches for NAS. Data were compared using Fisher exact tests for categorical data and t tests and Wilcoxon ranked sums for continuous data. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were well-matched except for postmenstrual age at morphine initiation (p = 0.04). The weight-based group had a larger initial morphine dose (p < 0.001) and fewer number of steps to maximum morphine dose (p = 0.009). There were no differences between groups in LOS, number of dose adjustments, doses administered, weaning steps, maximum dose, or need to re-escalate dosing. There was also no difference between the first 3 modified Finnegan scores (MFS) after transferring patients to a neonatology service. Neonates with symptom-based dosing had a higher maximum MFS (p = 0.024). Neonates in the symptom-based group required adjunct therapy more often (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Data indicate the dosing strategy impacts number of steps to reach maximum dose and need for adjunctive therapy. Weight-based dosing may decrease the number of steps required to reach the morphine maximum dose and the need for adjunctive therapy by controlling NAS symptoms earlier.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。