Abstract
Statistical and analytical methods using artificial intelligence approaches such as machine learning (ML) are increasingly being applied to the field of pediatrics, particularly to neonatology. This study compared the representative ML analysis and the logistic regression (LR), which is a traditional statistical analysis method, using them to predict mortality of very low birth weight infants (VLBWI). We included 7472 VLBWI data from a nationwide Korean neonatal network. Eleven predictor variables (neonatal factors: male sex, gestational age, 5 min Apgar scores, body temperature, and resuscitation at birth; maternal factors: diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chorioamnionitis, premature rupture of membranes, antenatal steroid, and cesarean delivery) were selected based on clinical impact and statistical analysis. We compared the predicted mortality between ML methods—such as artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM)—and LR with a randomly selected training set (80%) and a test set (20%). The model performances of area under the receiver operating curve (95% confidence interval) equaled LR 0.841 (0.811−0.872), ANN 0.845 (0.815−0.875), and RF 0.826 (0.795−0.858). The exception was SVM 0.631 (0.578−0.683). No statistically significant differences were observed between the performance of LR, ANN, and RF (i.e., p > 0.05). However, the SVM model was lower (p < 0.01). We suggest that VLBWI mortality prediction using ML methods would yield the same prediction rate as the traditional statistical LR method and may be suitable for predicting mortality. However, low prediction rates are observed in certain ML methods; hence, further research is needed on these limitations and selecting an appropriate method.