Abstract
The primary objective was to assess the utility of routine 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound in the evaluation of infertile women and to estimate the prevalence of uterine anomalies before the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART), using the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy classification system. A second objective was to assess the effect of uterine anomalies on the pregnancy rate in patients who underwent assisted reproductive techniques.We retrospectively studied 668 patients treated in the Department Obstetrics Gynecology and Neonatology "Sf Ioan" Clinical Emergency Hospital and in the Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine "'Transilvania" University of Brasov between July 2016 and February 2017 for subfertility. Patients were examined using 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) transvaginal ultrasound. Müllerian duct anomalies were present in 6.13% of patients, with the most common anomaly being a dysmorphic uterus (class U1c in 42.68% of patients), 17 patients (20.73%) with incompletely septate uterus (class U2a), 12 patients (14.63%) with a completely septate uterus (classU2b), 8 patients (9.75%) with a partly bicorporeal uterus (classU3a), and 6 patients (7.31%) with a completely bicorporeal uterus (class U3b). Only 1 (1.21%) patient had an aplastic uterus without a rudimentary cavity (class U5b). The pregnancy rate in the presence of uterine anomalies was 55% and the pregnancy rate in control group patients was 39.8%. The incidence of pregnancy in the group with uterine anomalies was statistically similar with the control group of normal uterus (P < .11). For ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate, our data indicated a slightly elevated rate for both of those indexes in the anomalies group. The incidence of miscarriage in the presence of uterine anomalies was 24% and 6.7% in the control group, which is statistically significant (P = .05).3D ultrasound evaluation of the uterus should be considered before ART in order to make an accurate diagnosis of the uterine congenital anomaly and improve ART results.