EVALUATION OF THE USE OF SHARED DECISION MAKING DURING ANTENATAL COUNSELLING FOR ANTICIPATED EXTREMELY PRETERM BIRTH

评估在预期极早产的产前咨询中使用共同决策的方法

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Paediatric organizations advocate the use of shared decision making (SDM) during counselling with families facing the birth of an extremely preterm infant. A local guideline was implemented in 2015 to promote SDM. OBJECTIVES: To determine the percentage of consultations where SDM was used. DESIGN/METHODS: Single-center prospective cohort study from September 2015 to June 2017 with data collected on all women presenting to obstetrical triage at 22 + 0 to 25 + 6 wks GA. Decision coaching (determined from the written consultation) during consultations served as a surrogate marker for use of SDM. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare proportions; logistic regression was used to examine trend over time. RESULTS: 130 women presented. A neonatology consultation occurred in 92 cases. SDM was used at initial consultation in 85% (78/92) of cases: 84% (16/19) at 22 wks; 88% (22/25) at 23 wks; 96% (27/28) at 24 wks; 65% (13/20) at 25 wks. Secondary analyses indicate use of SDM declined over time (p=0.03) and parental ability to come to a decision was not significantly different between SDM and ‘non-SDM’ consults (89% in SDM vs 92% in non-SDM; p=0.7). At 22 wks, 89% (17/19) made a decision; at 23 wks, 80% (20/25); at 24 wks, 86% (24/28); at 25 wks, 85% (17/20) (p=0.84). Infant survival to NICU discharge, using denominator ‘infants who received resuscitation’, was 67% (2/3) at 22 wks; 33% (3/9) at 23 wks; 87% (13/15) at 24 wks; 89% (17/19) at 25 wks. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an SDM framework is feasible with a resulting high percentage of consultations appearing to use SDM. The possible waning use of SDM and lower use at 25 wks GA requires further investigation. Recordings of consultations and parental perspectives to directly assess the use of SDM would provide greater insight into the applicability of SDM in this clinical setting.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。