Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In spontaneously breathing neonates, surfactant can be administered via thin catheter while enabling the own breathing (less invasive surfactant administration [LISA]). Alternatively, the neonate is intubated for surfactant delivery (intubation, surfactant, rapid extubation [INSURE]). Thus, the aim was to provide an overview of the efficacy of the LISA compared to INSURE. METHODS: We performed an umbrella review of previous meta-analyses including randomized controlled trials. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in July 2023. Two authors screened the search results, and systematic reviews with meta-analyses that focused on LISA versus INSURE were included. One author extracted, and another author validated the extracted data. AMSTAR-2 and ROBIS evaluations were performed by two authors independently. RESULTS: A total of 9 systematic reviews with meta-analyses were included. The quality according to AMSTAR-2 was high in one, moderate in one, low in three, and critically low in four. According to ROBIS, the risk of bias was low in three and high in six of the reviews. LISA was more effective than INSURE in preventing mechanical ventilation (8/8 reviews), death or BPD (4/4 reviews), death (3/9 reviews), and BPD (3/9 reviews). CONCLUSIONS: All the included systematic reviews and meta-analyses reported LISA to be more effective than INSURE in terms of need for mechanical ventilation and death or BPD. However, the quality of the published systematic reviews has been mostly deficient. Future systematic reviews should focus on reporting quality.