Abstract
In light of rising antibiotic resistance, better methods for selection of empiric antibiotic treatment based on clinical and microbiological data are needed. Most guidelines target specific clinical infections, and variably adjust empiric antibiotic selection by certain patient characteristics. Coverage estimates reflect the probability that an antibiotic regimen will be active against the causative pathogen once confirmed and can provide an objective basis for empiric regimen selection. Coverage can be estimated for specific infections using a weighted incidence syndromic combination antibiograms (WISCAs) framework. However, no comprehensive data combining clinical and microbiological data for specific clinical syndromes are available in Switzerland. We therefore describe estimating coverage from semi-deterministically linked routine microbiological and cohort data of hospitalised children with sepsis. Coverage estimates were generated for each hospital and separately pooling data across ten contributing hospitals for five pre-defined patient risk groups. Data from 1,082 patients collected during the Swiss Paediatric Sepsis Study (SPSS) 2011-2015 were included. Preterm neonates were the most commonly represented group, and half of infants and children had a comorbidity. 67% of neonatal sepsis cases were hospital-acquired late-onset whereas in children 76% of infections were community-acquired. Escherichia coli, Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and Staphylococcus aureus were the most common pathogens. At all hospitals, ceftazidime plus amikacin regimen had the lowest coverage, and coverage of amoxicillin plus gentamicin and meropenem were generally comparable. Coverage was improved when vancomycin was included in the regimen, reflecting uncertainty about the empirically targeted pathogen spectrum. Children with community-acquired infections had high coverage overall. It is feasible to estimate coverage of common empiric antibiotic regimens from linked data. Pooling data by patient risk groups with similar expected pathogen and susceptibility profiles may improve coverage estimate precision, supporting better differentiation of coverage between regimens. Identification of data sources, selection of regimens and consideration of pathogens to target for improved empiric coverage is important.