Abstract
Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by alterations in motile cilia function. The diagnosis of PCD is challenging due to the lack of standardized methods in clinical practice. High-speed video microscopy analysis (HSVA) directly evaluates ciliary beat frequency (CBF) in PCD. Recently, open-source ciliary analysis software applications have shown promise in measuring CBF accurately. However, there is limited knowledge about the performance of different software applications, creating a gap in understanding their comparative effectiveness in measuring CBF in PCD. We compared two open-source software applications, CiliarMove (v219) and Cilialyzer (v1.2.1-b3098cb), against the manual count method. We used high-speed videos of nasal ciliary brush samples from PCD RSPH4A-positive (PCD (RSPH4A)) patients and healthy controls. All three methods showed lower median CBF values for patients with PCD (RSPH4A) than in healthy controls. CiliarMove and Cilialyzer identified lower CBF in patients with PCD (RSPH4A), similarly to the manual count. Cilialyzer, CiliarMove, and manual count methods demonstrated statistical significance (p-value < 0.0001) in the difference of median CBF values between patients with PCD (RSPH4A) and healthy controls. Correlation coefficients between the manual count values against both software methods demonstrated positive linear relationships. These findings support the utility of open-source software-based analysis tools. Further studies are needed to validate these findings with other genetic variants and identify the optimal software for accurate CBF measurement in patients with PCD.