The influence of embryo stage on obstetric complications and perinatal outcomes following programmed compared to natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

胚胎发育阶段对程序化冷冻-解冻胚胎移植周期与自然冷冻-解冻胚胎移植周期后产科并发症和围产期结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of embryo stage at the time of transfer on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) versus natural FET cycles. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: Women with programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) and natural FET. INTERVENTIONS: The PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRT) were searched from 1983 to October 2022. Twenty-three observational studies were included. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcomes were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs), gestational hypertension and preeclampsia (PE). The secondary outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), placenta previa, postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), placental abruption, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), large for gestational age (LGA), small for gestational age (SGA), macrosomia, and preterm delivery (PTD). RESULTS: The risk of HDP (14 studies, odds ratio (OR) 2.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95-2.41; P<0.00001; I(2) = 43%), gestational hypertension (11 studies, OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.15-1.66; P=0.0006; I(2) = 19%), PE (12 studies, OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.88-2.32; P<0.00001; I(2) = 0%), GDM (20 studies, OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.02-1.17; P=0.02; I(2) = 8%), LGA (18 studies, OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.07-1.15; P<0.00001; I(2) = 46%), macrosomia (12 studies, OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.07-1.24; P=0.0002; I(2) = 31%), PTD (22 studies, OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.15-1.27; P<0.00001; I(2) = 49%), placenta previa (17 studies, OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.02-1.41; P=0.03; I(2) = 11%), PPROM (9 studies, OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02-1.39; P=0.02; I(2) = 40%), and PPH (12 studies, OR 2.27; 95% CI 2.02-2.55; P <0.00001; I(2) = 55%) were increased in programmed FET cycles versus natural FET cycles with overall embryo transfer. Blastocyst transfer had a higher risk of HDP (6 studies, OR 2.48; 95% CI 2.12-2.91; P<0.00001; I(2) = 39%), gestational hypertension (5 studies, OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.27-2.75; P=0.002; I(2) = 25%), PE (6 studies, OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.93-2.56; P<0.00001; I(2) = 0%), GDM (10 studies, OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.04-1.23; P=0.005; I(2) = 39%), LGA (6 studies, OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.07-1.21; P<0.0001; I(2) = 9%), macrosomia (4 studies, OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.05-1.26; P<0.002; I(2) = 68%), PTD (9 studies, OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.31-1.57; P<0.00001; I(2) = 22%), PPH (6 studies, OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.46-2.51; P<0.00001; I(2) = 55%), and PPROM (4 studies, OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.14-1.83; P=0.002; I(2) = 46%) in programmed FET cycles than in natural FET cycles. Cleavage-stage embryo transfers revealed no difference in HDPs (1 study, OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.32-2.02; P=0.65; I(2) not applicable), gestational hypertension (2 studies, OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.48-1.51; P=0.59; I(2) = 0%), PE (1 study, OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.58-2.42; P=0.64; I(2)not applicable), GDM (3 study, OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.52-1.20; P=0.27; I(2) = 21%), LGA (1 study, OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.62-2.11; P=0.66; I(2)not applicable), macrosomia (1 study, OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.54-2.77; P=0.64; I(2) not applicable), PTD (2 studies, OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.74-1.49; P=0.79; I(2) = 0%), PPH (1 study, OR 1.49; 95% CI 0.85-2.62; P=0.17; I(2)not applicable), or PPROM (2 studies, OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.46-1.21; P=0.23; I(2) = 0%) between programmed FET cycles and natural FET cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The risks of HDPs, gestational hypertension, PE, GDM, LGA, macrosomia, SGA, PTD, placenta previa, PPROM, and PPH were increased in programmed FET cycles versus natural FET cycles with overall embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer, but the risks were not clear for cleavage-stage embryo transfer.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。