Comparative Evaluation of Structured Clinical Case Examination Versus Traditional Long Case Examination for Assessing Clinical Competence in Pediatric Patients in India: A Quasi-experimental Study

印度儿科患者临床能力评估中结构化临床病例考试与传统长病例考试的比较评价:一项准实验研究

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: Due to subjectivity, traditional long cases present challenges in assessing clinical acumen. Implementing the Objective Structured Long Examination Record to tackle these concerns presents practical challenges. These challenges lead to considering the Structured Clinical Case Examination (SCCE) as a middle ground. This article aims to answer how clinical competence assessment in pediatrics differs when using a Structured Clinical Long Case Examination rather than a Traditional Long Case Examination (TLCE). METHODS: This study was conducted at the Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Shivamogga. The study focused on 133 final-year MBBS undergraduates during their pediatric posting. Students were assessed using TLCE and SCCE by two different faculties on the same day using a validated checklist for SCCE. The students' perceptions were collected via a questionnaire. The paired sample t-test compared TLCE and SCCE scores for a comprehensive evaluation. RESULTS: The paired sample t-test revealed a significant increase in marks obtained in SCCE (mean = 29.8, standard deviation, SD = 5.4) compared to TLCE (mean = 26.7, SD = 5.9) (t = 7.21, p < 0.001). Notably, 84.2% of students passed SCCE, compared to 69.9% passing TLCE. A higher proportion of students scored good (31.5%) and excellent (21.8%) marks in SCCE compared to TLCE (18.7% for good, 10.5% for excellent). Feedback from a Likert-scale questionnaire indicated strong student agreement with SCCE (χ² = 13.7, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION:  SCCE appears to be a useful structured method for assessing the clinical competency of final-year medical students, offering a more organized evaluation of diverse clinical skills. Students reported favorable perceptions of SCCE, particularly regarding clarity of expectations and inclusion of communication skills. In conclusion, SCCE's structured, observational approach has the potential to address inadequacies in clinical evaluation and enhance clinical skill learning in graduates. Further studies are needed to confirm its broader applicability and effectiveness.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。