Conclusion
Expression of hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-miR-210 reflects maternal pathophysiological status, while hsa-miR-29b-3p reflects placental status. These findings suggest that EV-miRNA are involved in GVC, and that they may be used to distinguish between pathologies of placental and maternal origins in preeclampsia.
Methods
Blood samples were obtained from 15 non-pregnant (NP), 18 healthy-pregnant (HP), and 23 women with GVC during the third trimester. Placental sections were obtained after caesarian section. Platelet-poor-plasma (PPP) and EV pellets were characterized: EV size/concentration, protein content and miRNA expression were measured by nanoparticle tracking analysis, western blot, nano-string technology and RT-PCR. The effects of EVs on trophoblasts and EC miRNA expression were evaluated.
Results
Higher EVs concentrations were observed in HP-PPP and GVC-PPP (p < 0.0001) compared to the NP-PPP. The concentration of large EVs (>100 nm) was higher in PPP and EV pellets of HP and GVC compared to the NP group. EV pellets of pregnant women demonstrated lower expression of exosomal markers CD63/CD81 compared to NP-EVs. GVC-EVs expressed more human placental lactogen (hPL) hormone than HP-EVs, reflecting their placental origin. Screening of miRNAs in EV pellets and in PPP identified certain miRNAs that were highly expressed only in EVs pellets of the HP (13%) and GVC groups (15%), but not in the NP group. Differences were detected in the expression of hsa-miR-16-5p, hsa-miR-210, and hsa-miR-29b-3p. The expression of hsa-miR-16-5p and hsa-miR-210 was low in EV pellets obtained from NP, higher in HP-EVs, and significantly lower in GVC-EVs. Except for hsa-miR-29b-3p, which was upregulated in GVC, no significant differences were found in the levels of other miRNAs in placental sections. Exposure to GVC-EVs resulted in higher expression of hsa-miR-29b-3p compared to cells exposed to HP-EVs in villous trophoblasts, but not in EC.