Abstract
PURPOSE: Phenotyping is critical for informing rare disease diagnosis and treatment, but disease phenotypes are often embedded in unstructured text. While natural language processing (NLP) can automate extraction, a major bottleneck is developing annotated corpora. Recently, prompt learning with large language models (LLMs) has been shown to lead to generalizable results without any (zero-shot) or few annotated samples (few-shot), but none have explored this for rare diseases. Our work is the first to study prompt learning for identifying and extracting rare disease phenotypes in the zero- and few-shot settings. METHODS: We compared the performance of prompt learning with ChatGPT and fine-tuning with BioClinicalBERT. We engineered novel prompts for ChatGPT to identify and extract rare diseases and their phenotypes (e.g., diseases, symptoms, and signs), established a benchmark for evaluating its performance, and conducted an in-depth error analysis. RESULTS: Overall, fine-tuning BioClinicalBERT resulted in higher performance (F1 of 0.689) than ChatGPT (F1 of 0.472 and 0.610 in the zero- and few-shot settings, respectively). However, ChatGPT achieved higher accuracy for rare diseases and signs in the one-shot setting (F1 of 0.778 and 0.725). Conversational, sentence-based prompts generally achieved higher accuracy than structured lists. CONCLUSION: Prompt learning using ChatGPT has the potential to match or outperform fine-tuning BioClinicalBERT at extracting rare diseases and signs with just one annotated sample. Given its accessibility, ChatGPT could be leveraged to extract these entities without relying on a large, annotated corpus. While LLMs can support rare disease phenotyping, researchers should critically evaluate model outputs to ensure phenotyping accuracy.