A Qualitative Examination of Job Satisfaction in Emergency Medicine From the Perspective of Physicians Also Working in Prehospital and Retrieval Medicine

从同时从事院前急救和转运医学的医生的角度,对急诊医学从业人员的工作满意度进行定性研究

阅读:2

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Low job satisfaction amongst emergency physicians is a significant risk to career sustainability. Anecdotal evidence suggests that prehospital and retrieval medicine (PHARM) physicians experience relatively high job satisfaction. The objective of this qualitative study was to explore the research question: 'What influences job satisfaction and sustainability for emergency physicians who maintain dual roles in PHARM and the emergency department?' METHODS: Eligible emergency physicians from Australia and New Zealand were interviewed in-depth about their experiences and perceptions of job satisfaction and sustainability. The research team applied experiential knowledge and an inductive analytic approach to construct a conceptual understanding of the physicians' job satisfaction from the data, including factors contributing to career sustainability. RESULTS: Our sample included 11 participants, six from Australia and five from New Zealand. We identified six key themes influencing job satisfaction: workload, job factors, personal factors, focus on well-being, culture and management and bureaucracy. These are explored in detail, along with ideas on career sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: The nature of emergency medicine work remains inherently satisfying for participants in this study but is influenced by the culture and current working conditions found in many emergency departments, particularly when these factors impact the standard of clinical care physicians feel they can provide. Our findings offer practical guidance on protective factors for job satisfaction and sustainability, including fractional appointments, diversity and flexibility of practice, continuous professional development and access to professional supervision or peer support. Preserving career longevity in emergency medicine requires the implementation of evidence-based, sustainable initiatives.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。