Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the current study were to (a) identify long-term tele-audiology services reported to be implemented beyond the research phase and determine whether they are sustained, (b) map the implementation process to Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies guidelines and (c) map the factors that influenced its sustainability to the Implementation Outcomes Framework (IOF) to understand the gaps from an implementation research perspective. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study included a scoping review of articles describing long-term tele-audiology services from around the world to determine the factors influencing the implementation. Six electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and ProQuest) were searched for literature published between 2010 and 2023. This was followed by semistructured interviews (SSIs), which were guided by the IOF. Six project implementers were interviewed to obtain an in-depth understanding of factors that influenced sustainability of these tele-audiology services. Thematic analysis of the interview transcripts was carried out using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 32 tele-audiology studies included in the review, which were then mapped to 21 projects. The findings of the scoping review reveal that tele-audiology services were predominantly provided using synchronous telepractice methods. The 'professional-facilitator-patient' model was most commonly used. None of the studies reported the use of implementation research and/or outcome frameworks. Factors that influenced sustainability of tele-audiology services were identified from the combined results of the scoping review and the SSIs. These factors could be mapped to implementation outcomes of acceptability, adoption, feasibility, implementation cost and sustainability. CONCLUSION: Implementation research and/or outcome framework should be used to guide the implementation processes, its evaluation and measurement of outcomes systematically in tele-audiology service delivery. When such frameworks are used, gaps in information regarding the context influencing implementation, reporting of fidelity and adaptability measures can be addressed.