Comparison of the diagnostic performance and clinical role of different ultrasound-based thyroid malignancy risk stratification systems for medullary thyroid carcinoma

比较不同基于超声的甲状腺恶性肿瘤风险分层系统对甲状腺髓样癌的诊断性能和临床作用

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study sought to investigate the applicability of different ultrasound (US) thyroid risk stratification systems in diagnosing medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and determining the need for biopsy. METHODS: In total, 34 MTC nodules, 54 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) nodules, and 62 benign thyroid nodules were examined in this study. All the diagnoses were histopathologically confirmed postoperatively. All the thyroid nodule sonographic features were recorded and categorized by 2 independent reviewers according to the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) of the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines, the European Thyroid Association (EU) TIRADS, the Kwak-TIRADS, and the Chinese TIRADS (C-TIRADS). The sonographic differences and risk stratifications of the MTCs, PTCs, and benign thyroid nodules were analyzed. The diagnostic performance and recommended biopsy rates for each classification system were evaluated. RESULTS: The risk stratifications of MTCs were all higher than the benign thyroid nodules (P<0.01) and lower than PTCs (P<0.01) with each classification system. Hypoechogenicity and malignant marginal features were independent risk factors for identifying malignant thyroid nodules, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for identifying MTCs was lower than that for identifying PTCs (0.873 vs. 0.954, respectively). The AUCs, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and accuracy values of the 5 systems for MTC were all lower than those for PTC. The best cut-off values for diagnosing MTC were TIRADS (TR) 4 in the ACR-TIRADS, intermediate suspicion in the ATA guidelines, TR 4 in EU-TIRADS, and TR 4b in both the Kwak-TIRADS and the C-TIRADS. The Kwak-TIRADS had the highest recommended biopsy rate for MTCs (97.1%), followed by the ATA guidelines, the EU-TIRADS (88.2%), the C-TIRADS (85.3%), and the ACR-TIRADS (79.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The US-based thyroid malignancy risk stratification systems analyzed in this study were able to satisfactorily identify MTC and recommend biopsy, but the diagnostic performance of these systems for MTC was not as good as that for PTC.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。