Single-centre comparison of non-familial, familial and monogenic lupus

单中心比较非家族性、家族性和单基因狼疮

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is a significant genetic contribution to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Monogenic SLE is a distinct form of SLE. We investigated whether familial or known monogenic lupus cases are distinguishable from non-familial lupus by clinical or laboratory phenotype in a population with high rates of consanguinity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study on 24 multiplex families, comprising 62 cases, and 95 non-familial lupus controls. Demographic and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria were compared between the two groups. Familial cases were also evaluated by whole exome sequencing and cellular phenotyping. Statistical analysis was performed using R Studio. RESULTS: Familial and non-familial lupus cases were similar although familial cases were younger at presentation (18 y vs 26 y, OR = 0.91, P = 1.61 × 10-5), a higher prevalence of synovitis (OR = 2.7, P = 0.013) and lower prevalence of high level of dsDNA antibodies (OR = 0.25, P = 1.9 × 10-3). Exome sequencing of a subset yielded a diagnostic rate of 36%. Monogenic lupus were distinguished from other familial cases by an even younger age at presentation (6 y vs 19 y, OR = 0.82, P = 2.13 × 10-3), non-biased male-to-female ratio (P = 0.077) and expansion of exhausted CD4+ T cells (CD4+CD45RA+PD-1+) (P = 1.7 × 10-4). CONCLUSION: Overall, clinical phenotype is a poor indicator of familial or monogenic lupus. Familial lupus and monogenic familial lupus (MoFL) tend to present at a younger age than the Non-MoFL, exhibit less female bias and in some cases are distinguished by a lymphocyte signature. Consanguinity increases the rate of monogenic familial lupus and these cases can present in adulthood.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。