Interobserver agreement in dysplasia grading of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: performance of Kyoto guidelines and optimization of endomicroscopy biomarkers through pathology reclassification

导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤发育不良分级的观察者间一致性:京都指南的实施及通过病理重新分类优化内镜生物标志物

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Interobserver agreement (IOA) among pancreaticobiliary (PB) pathologists in evaluating high-grade dysplasia and/or invasive carcinoma (HGD-IC) of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) remains understudied. EUS-guided needle-based confocal endomicroscopy (nCLE) can evaluate papillary architecture in branch duct IPMNs. We assessed IOA among PB pathologists in classifying dysplasia in resected IPMNs and compared the performance of the Kyoto guidelines' high-risk stigmata (HRS) and presurgical EUS-nCLE against reclassified pathology. METHODS: Participants in prospective clinical trials (2015-2023) with resected IPMNs were included. Blinded PB pathologists independently reviewed histopathology, achieving a consensus diagnosis. The accuracies of cyst fluid next-generation sequencing analysis, EUS-nCLE, and Kyoto HRS in predicting HGD-IC were compared with the reclassified pathology. RESULTS: Among 64 participants, 25 (39%) exhibited HGD-IC (17 HGD, 8 invasive carcinoma). Disagreements occurred in 14% of cases with substantial IOA (κ = 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.88) between 2 PB pathologists for differentiating HGD-IC versus low-grade dysplasia (LGD). To detect HGD-IC, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Kyoto HRS and EUS-nCLE were 52%, 95%, 78% and 68%, 87%, 80%, respectively. Integrating nCLE with Kyoto HRS improved sensitivity to 80%, with specificity and accuracy at 82% and 81%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of next-generation sequencing (n = 47) to detect HGD-IC were 6.3%, 100%, and 68%, respectively. A unique subset of IPMNs were identified in all (n = 8, P = .01) cases where presurgical EUS-nCLE underestimated dysplasia revealing a distinct micropapillary architecture on postsurgical histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial IOA among experienced PB pathologists, a second pathologist's review may be warranted for dysplasia classification in IPMNs under certain circumstances. Incorporating an imaging biomarker such as EUS-nCLE with Kyoto HRS improves sensitivity for HGD-IC without sacrificing accuracy.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。