Abstract
The Fontan procedure for univentricular heart defects creates a unique circulation where all pulmonary blood flow is passively supplied directly from systemic veins. Computational simulations, aimed at optimizing the surgery, have assumed blood to be a Newtonian fluid without evaluating the potential error introduced by this assumption. We compared flow behavior between a non-Newtonian blood analog (0.04% xanthan gum) and a control Newtonian fluid (45% glycerol) in a simplified model of the Fontan circulation. Particle image velocimetry was used to examine flow behavior at two different cardiac outputs and two caval blood flow distributions. Pressure and flow rates were measured at each inlet and outlet. Velocity, shear strain, and shear stress maps were derived from velocity data. Power loss was calculated from pressure, flow, and velocity data. Power loss was increased in all test conditions with xanthan gum vs. glycerol (mean 10±2.9% vs. 5.6±1.3%, p=0.032). Pulmonary blood flow distribution differed in all conditions, more so at low cardiac output. Caval blood flow mixing patterns and shear stress were also qualitatively different between the solutions in all conditions. We conclude that assuming blood to be a Newtonian fluid introduces considerable error into simulations of the Fontan circulation, where low-shear flow predominates.