Abstract
This paper addresses the question of whether or not interstitial fluid flow due to the blood circulation accounts for the observed periosteal bone formation associated with comprised venous return (venous stasis). Increased interstitial fluid flow induced by increased intramedullary pressure has been proposed to account for the periosteal response in venous stasis. To investigate the shear stresses acting on bone cell processes due to the blood circulation-driven interstitial fluid flow, a poroelastic model is extended to the situation in which the interstitial fluid flow in an osteon is driven by the pulsatile extravascular pressure in the osteonal canal as well as by the applied cyclic mechanical loading. Our results show that under normal conditions, the pulsatile extravascular pressure in the osteonal canal due to cardiac contraction (10mm Hg at 2Hz) and skeletal muscle contraction (30mm Hg at 1Hz) induce peak shear stresses on the osteocyte cell processes that are two orders of magnitude lower than those induced by physiological mechanical loading (100 microstrain at 1Hz). In venous stasis the induced peak shear stress is reduced further compared to the normal conditions because, although the mean intramedullary pressure is increased, the amplitude of its pulsatile component is decreased. These results suggest that the interstitial fluid flow is unlikely to cause the periosteal bone formation in venous stasis. However, the mean interstitial fluid pressure is found to increase in venous stasis, which may pressurize the periosteum and thus play a role in periosteal bone formation.