Histological Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Versus Spontaneous Healing Following Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

拔牙后牙槽嵴保存与自愈的组织学结果:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate histological outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) compared to spontaneous healing after tooth extraction, focusing on the percentage of new bone formation and residual graft material. Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing histomorphometric outcomes in humans were included. Eligible studies compared ARP using various graft materials to unassisted socket healing. Primary outcome was new bone formation (%); secondary outcome was residual graft material (%). Random-effects meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were conducted based on graft material type, membrane application, and healing duration. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and GRADE, respectively. Results: Twenty-two RCTs (816 patients) met inclusion criteria. Overall, ARP did not result in significantly greater new bone formation compared to spontaneous healing (mean difference -5.86%, 95% CI: -13.84% to 2.11%, p = 0.15; I(2) = 98%), revealing a paradoxical trend: while ARP maintains ridge volume, histologically it may yield slightly lower proportions of vital bone compared to unassisted healing. However, autologous biomaterials (e.g., PRF/CGF) and xenografts with collagen membranes showed significantly new bone formation (mean differences +16.28% and -22.47%; p< 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Residual graft content was highest in relation to xenografts and allografts, particularly without membranes. Long-term studies demonstrated a statistically significant benefit for ARP following excluding high-risk trials. Conclusions: Histological advantage of ARP is biomaterial-dependent. Autologous platelet concentrates and xenografts with membranes yielded the most consistent bone regeneration outcomes. Clinical Relevance: Although ARP preserves socket volume, its histological superiority over natural healing is not universal. Therefore, the selection of biomaterials and determination of and appropriate healing period are critical parameters.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。