Abstract
The larval fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, 7-day subchronic survival and growth standard toxicity test method is commonly used for research and regulatory testing of effluents and compounds, including emerging contaminants such as Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS). Existing feeding guidelines for testing are described in multiple methods but are open to interpretation. The current study sought to determine the impact of feeding ration on P. promelas survival and biomass during a subchronic exposure to PFOS. The study was conducted in two phases: (1) a control experiment to determine the most significant feeding ration factors that maximize biomass, with consideration to laboratory logistics, and (2) application of down-selected feeding rations in a PFOS exposure to determine toxicity reference values. The control optimization study supported that feeding ration and feeding frequency were significant factors in fish biomass. In the subsequent PFOS study, fish were fed a high or low ration of Artemia twice daily, while exposed to 0.3 to 3.4 mg/L PFOS. Fish fed a high ration of Artemia had significantly (p < 0.05) greater biomass than fish fed a low ration in all exposure concentrations except 3.4 mg/L, where survival was low in both treatments. The feeding ration was not a significant factor on the survival endpoint for either treatment, but the PFOS concentration was (p < 0.0001) (high ration LC50 = 2.44 mg/L; low ration LC50 = 2.25 mg/L). These findings contribute to a better understanding of the impact feeding ration has in toxicity assessments and downstream regulatory decisions.