Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) is a heterogeneous category of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC); the management of this condition remains controversial. The clinical significance of such patients relies on the exclusion of malignancy. In this study, we aimed to determine the validity of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) (2017) for predicting malignancy in this specific category of patients. METHODS: In this study, we analysed a cohort of patients from our previous retrospective study. This four-year retrospective cohort study included all cases undergoing surgery with a cytological diagnosis of AUS/FLUS. We enrolled 110 cases with documented final histopathological diagnoses and ultrasound examinations. RESULTS: The study included 83 females (75.5%) and 27 males (24.5%). The overall risk of malignancy (ROM) for AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules was 47.3%. The ROMs of TI-RADS 3 (TR3), TI-RADS 4 (TR4), and TI-RADS 5 (TR5) were 43.5%, 49.4% and 40%, respectively. There was no significant association between TI-RADS and final pathological analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated FNAC with initial AUS/FLUS nodules is crucial. Our findings showed that ACR TI-RADS did not contribute to the cancer risk stratification of AUS/FLUS nodules. A large prospective multi-institutional study is now required to determine the validity of ACR TI-RADS and whether other adjunct clinical, cytological, molecular, or biochemical tools could facilitate the management of patients with these heterogeneous nodules.