Incidence of diffuse parenchymal lung disease in patients meeting the Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome on mechanical ventilation

符合柏林急性呼吸窘迫综合征定义且接受机械通气的患者中弥漫性实质性肺疾病的发生率

阅读:4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The simplicity of the diagnostic definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has led to its diagnosis in patients with new-onset or exacerbation of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs). This study investigated the incidence of DPLDs in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure who met the Berlin definition. METHODS: This Japan-based multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients on mechanical ventilation who met the Berlin definition. For all participants, diagnosis was made by pulmonology specialists in DPLD and thoracic radiology (blinded to clinical diagnoses) by reviewing an extensive database designed for DPLD diagnosis across 10 participating hospitals. RESULTS: Of 13 612 patients admitted to the intensive care unit during the study period, 272 met the Berlin definition of ARDS and were included for analysis. All underwent at least one chest computed tomography scan; none underwent lung biopsy. Briefly, 182 were designated classic ARDS (67%), 69 non-IPF (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) DPLDs (25%) and 21 IPF (8%) by DPLD specialists. Of the 90 patients diagnosed with DPLD (IPF or non-IPF) by specialists, 35% were diagnosed with classic ARDS by intensivists at the end of the clinical course. Diagnostic classifications of classic ARDS and IPF by DPLD specialists were associated with time-to-death (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.58 (95% CI 1.03-2.45), p=0.038, and adjusted HR 1.73 (95% CI 1.01-2.97), p=0.045, respectively) and in-hospital mortality (adjusted HR 1.54 (95% CI 1.06-2.23), p=0.022 for classic ARDS) versus non-IPF DPLDs; intensivist diagnostic classifications were not. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of patients within the Berlin definition were retrospectively diagnosed with new-onset or acutely exacerbated DPLD by specialists.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。