Abstract
In this paper we suggest and test a specific hypothesis relating the attachment-detachment cycle of cross bridges between actin (I) and myosin (A) filaments to the measured length-tension dynamics of active insect fibrillar flight muscle. It is first shown that if local A-filament strain perturbs the rate constants in the cross-bridge cycle appropriately, then exponentially delayed tension changes can follow imposed changes of length; the latter phenomenon is sufficient for the work-producing property of fibrillar muscle, as measured with small-signal forcing of length and at low Ca(2+) concentration, and possibly for related effects described recently in frog striated muscle. It is not clear a priori that the above explanation of work production by fibrillar muscle will remain tenable when the viscoelastic complexity of the heterogeneous sarcomere is taken into account. However, White's (1967) recent mechanical and electron microscope study of the passive dynamics of glycerinated fibrillar muscle has produced a model of the distributed viscoeleastic structure sufficiently explicit that alternative schemes for cross-bridge force generation in this muscle can now be tested more critically than previously. Therefore, we derive and solve third-order partial-differential equations which relate local interfilament shear forces associated with the perturbed cross-bridge cycles to the over-all length-tension dynamics of an idealized sarcomere. We then show (a) that the starting hypothesis can account approximately for the small-signal dynamics of glycerinated muscle in the work-producing state over two decades of frequency and (b) that the rate constants for cross-bridge formation and breakage, restricted solely by fitting of the model to the mechanical data, determine a cycling rate of cross bridges in the model compatible with recent measurements of ATP hydrolysis rate vs. stretch in this muscle. Finally, the formulation is extended tentatively to the large-signal nonlinear case, and shown to compare favorably with previous suggestions for the origin of the work-producing dynamics of fibrillar flight muscle.