Background
Mammary serine protease inhibitor (maspin) is well known as a tumor suppressor gene in several types of cancers and its nuclear localization is essential for its tumor-suppressive function. We previously reported that the cytoplasmic-only localization of maspin is significantly correlated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). To clarify whether maspin in LUAD acts as a tumor promoter or suppressor, we examined the subcellular localization-dependent biological functions of maspin in human LUAD cell lines.
Conclusion
The invasive capability of LUAD cells is regulated by the intracellular localization of maspin. Clarification of the molecular mechanism underlying the subcellular localization-dependent function of maspin will promote a deeper understanding of LUAD development and progression.
Methods
The expression levels and subcellular localization of maspin were investigated by performing immunoblotting and immunofluorescence in human LUAD cell lines (PC-9, A549, NCI-H23, RERF-LC-KJ) and human bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B). We then established stable cell lines overexpressing maspin (A549-maspin and RERF-LC-KJ-maspin) and investigated their subcellular localization. Cell invasion assays of these cell lines were performed to examine their invasiveness. Moreover, the mRNA expression levels between epithelial cell markers (E-cadherin) and mesenchymal cell markers (N-cadherin and vimentin) were compared.
Results
The expression of maspin in PC-9 cells was comparable to that in BEAS-2B cells, whereas its expression in A549, NCI-H23, and RERF-LC-KJ cells was decreased. The cell invasion capability of A549-maspin cells showing pancellular expression was significantly decreased compared with that of A549-control cells. By contrast, the cell invasion capability of RERF-LC-KJ-maspin cells showing cytoplasmic-only expression was significantly increased compared with that of RERF-LC-KJ-control cells. The mRNA expression levels of N-cadherin, but not E-cadherin and vimentin, in A549-maspin cells was significantly downregulated compared with that in A549-control cells. No significant differences in these markers were observed between RERF-LC-KJ-maspin and RERF-LC-KJ-control cells.