Pharmacokinetic Cross-Over Study of Pharmacy-Compounded Chenodeoxycholic Acid Capsules Compared to Authorized Capsules

药房配制鹅去氧胆酸胶囊与上市胶囊的药代动力学交叉研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Purpose: The Amsterdam UMC pharmacy has been compounding chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) capsules for Dutch cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis patients since 2018. However, limited data are available on the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of therapeutic CDCA formulations. Methods: An open-label, single-center, randomized, two-period, two-sequence, cross-over study was conducted in 12 healthy volunteers to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of pharmacy-compounded CDCA capsules to that of the authorized CDCA product. Results: Both formulations reached peak plasma concentrations (t(max)) at approximately 1 h post-dose. The mean AUC((0-6h)) values were 262.4 (±69.4) µmol∙min/L for the compounded capsules and 248.0 (±78.1) µmol∙min/L for the authorized capsules, with a 90% confidence interval (CI) for the AUC((0-6h)) ratio of 0.89-1.30, exceeding the accepted bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. The mean C(max) for the compounded formulation (2.96 ± 0.91 µmol/L) was significantly lower than that of the comparator product (4.42 ± 1.36 µmol/L; p = 0.0040), with a 90% CI for the C(max) ratio of 0.57-0.80, also outside the bioequivalence range. Conclusions: Overall, the pharmacy-compounded and authorized capsules demonstrate a comparable AUC((0-6h)) and t(max). Bioequivalence could not be demonstrated, primarily due to high variation, a significantly lower C(max), and an AUC((0-6h)) ratio outside the accepted limits. These findings indicate that the compounded formulation results in reduced systemic peak exposure compared with the authorized product. However, given the high variation, a larger sample size would be needed to further investigate bioequivalence in future studies.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。