Are low-intensity induction strategies better for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia?

低强度诱导治疗策略是否更适合老年急性髓系白血病患者?

阅读:1

Abstract

This study compares outcomes of low-intensity versus standard-intensity induction strategies for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia at the Weill Cornell Leukemia Program. From 1999 to 2009, 298 adults ≥ 60 years with AML underwent induction chemotherapy with low-intensity and standard-intensity regimens, based on physician and patient preferences and investigational protocol availability. Overall, 33% of the cohort achieved complete remission with initial treatment, 23% with low-intensity induction and 53% with standard-intensity induction (P<0.0001). The median overall survival was 6.5 months and there was no significant difference in overall survival between patients initially treated with a low-intensity regimen compared to those receiving standard-intensity induction. There were no differences in 30- or 60-day mortality between the two groups.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。