A comparative study of double occlusal splints combined with joint cavity injection and manual reduction in the treatment of anterior disc displacement without reduction versus anterior repositioning splints: a retrospective cohort study

双咬合夹板联合关节腔注射及手法复位治疗不可复位前盘移位与前移位夹板治疗的比较研究:一项回顾性队列研究

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Some patients with anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDWoR) experience restricted mouth opening after manual reduction. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of modified double occlusal splints with traditional anterior repositioning splints (ARS) in treating ADDWoR, to identify a simple, effective, and stable clinical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 107 patients were enrolled in this single-center retrospective study. Those using double occlusal splints after successful manual reduction were assigned to observation groups (Group A, Group B). Patients who wore traditional ARS were enrolled as the control groups (Group C, Group D). Group A (n = 29) and Group C (n = 25) corresponded to direct manual reduction, while Group B (n = 27) and Group D (n = 26) corresponded to manual reduction following intra-articular injection. The pain with visual analogue scale (VAS), maximum mouth opening (MMO), triction temporomandibular joint disorder index, and clinical efficacy ratings of the patients in each group were statistically analyzed before treatment, and at the first month, the third month, the sixth month after treatment. Using magnetic resonance imaging technology to observe the relative positional relationship between the articular disc and condylar before and after treatment. RESULTS: At one-month post-treatment, groups A and B showed significant improvements in VAS, MMO, CMI, and DI compared to control groups C and D (P < 0.05). At three and six months, group A had significantly lower CMI and DI than group C, with no significant VAS or MMO difference. Group B showed greater improvement than group D across all parameters (P < 0.05). Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed higher disc reduction rates in the observation groups (χ2 = 3.928, P < 0.05). Clinical efficacy was 89.3% in experimental groups compared to 74.5% in control groups (χ(2) = 3.990, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Double occlusal splints demonstrated superior stabilization following early manual repositioning and improved structural outcomes compared to ARS. These findings support their clinical value as a treatment option for ADDWoR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that modified double occlusal splints provide more effective and stable outcomes than traditional ARS, particularly after early manual disc repositioning. The findings offer clinicians a simplified, non-invasive treatment strategy that enhances long-term joint stabilization and functional recovery in ADDWoR patients.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。