In vitro comparison of Enterococcus Faecalis survival in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH plus, endoseal MTA, and cold ceramic sealers

体外比较使用AH Plus、Endoseal MTA和冷陶瓷封闭剂进行根管治疗后,粪肠球菌在牙本质小管中的存活情况

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most common microorganism responsible for post-endodontic infections, which can penetrate deep into dentinal tubules. This study aimed to compare the survival of E. faecalis in dentinal tubules following root canal therapy with AH Plus (AHP), Endoseal MTA (ESM), and cold ceramic (CC) sealers. METHODS: In this in vitro experimental study, 80 single-canal human teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction. The root canals were cleaned and shaped, and auto-clave sterilized after smear layer removal. The roots were then inoculated with E. faecalis, and incubated for 3 weeks. The teeth were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 20) for root canal obturation with AHP, ESM, and CC sealers and 2% gutta-percha with the cold lateral compaction technique. The fourth group served as the control group. After 30 days, dentin chips were collected from the canals, and cultured on blood agar. The colony count was reported and analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: The mean colony count was 23.73 ± 13.84 in the AHP, 34.78 ± 18.75 in the ESM, and 28.47 ± 13.73 in the CC group after 30 days. The difference in this regard was not significant among the three experimental groups (P = 0.102). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the results indicated comparable antibacterial activity of AHP, ESM, and CC sealers against E. faecalis in infected dentinal tubules after 30 days.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。