Biomechanical evaluation of six zygomatic implants versus four zygomatic implants combined with dental implants in the treatment of different maxillary defects

对六颗颧骨种植体与四颗颧骨种植体联合其他种植体治疗不同上颌缺损的生物力学性能进行评估

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the biomechanics of six zygomatic implants (ZIs) and dental implants (DIs) combined with four ZIs with different maxilla defects. METHODS: Three-dimensional constructs of the ZIs, DIs human skulls, and maxillary prostheses were created using SolidWorks Software (Version 2015, Dassault Systems SolidWorks Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA). Eight finite element models of the skull with four different alveolar defect types (0-4) were constructed. Type 0: No defect; Type 1: Bilateral posterior defects; Type 2: Right posterior defect; Type 3: Anterior and left posterior defects; Type 4: Bilateral posterior and anterior defects. In two models with the same defect type (for defect types 0-2), six ZIs or two DIs combined with four ZIs were inserted into the maxilla. Six ZIs were inserted in the maxilla models with defect types 3 and 4. Vertical (150 N) and masseteric (300 N) loads were simulated on the prosthesis. The maximum Von Mises stress in the implants/surrounding bone and bone deformation were evaluated. RESULTS: The maximum Von Mises stresses in bone/implant were found highest in the defect type 2 model with four ZIs combined with two DIs. The lowest maximum Von Mises stress for bone was detected in the model with defect type 0 and with six ZIs. CONCLUSION: Among the four types of defects, the posterior unilateral defect caused the highest stress value.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。