Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several calcium silicate-based sealers have recently emerged in endodontics. This study aimed to compare the immediate and delayed shear bond strength between the bioceramic and calcium hydroxide-based sealers and different resin-based restorative materials. METHODS: One hundred and twenty specimens with a 3-mm depth and a 3-mm diameter were prepared. They were evenly divided into two groups, the bioceramic sealer and calcium hydroxide-based sealer groups. Each primary group was subdivided into two subgroups based on the restorative material used; i.e., the flowable resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer subgroups. Moreover, each subgroup was further divided into the restoration process's timing: either immediately post-sealing or delayed after setting the sealers for seven days. The mode of failure was assessed by stereomicroscopic examination. RESULTS: The highest shear bond strength was found when the bioceramic sealer was used and restored with the flowable resin composite. The strengths were 8.45 (1.17) and 6.67 (1.60) megapascals (MPa) in the immediate and delayed restoration groups, respectively. In contrast, the lowest strength, 2.91 (1.22) MPa, was recorded when calcium hydroxide-based sealer was employed and restored after allowing the sealer to set completely with resin-modified glass ionomer. Notably, there were no cohesive fractures within the tested restorative materials. All observed fractures occurred within the sealer materials, at the interface of the sealer and restorative material, or in combination. Moreover, the most common failure was a mixed failure. CONCLUSIONS: When flowable resin composite was used immediately before complete setting, bioceramic sealers showed a higher bond strength than calcium hydroxide-based sealers.